Common Chemotherapy Is Not Heart Toxic in Patients With BRCA1/2 Mutations
Use of anthracycline-based chemotherapy, a common treatment for breast cancer, has negligible cardiac toxicity in women whose tumors have BRCA1/2 mutations — despite preclinical evidence that such treatment can damage the heart.
December 9, 2014
SAN ANTONIO (Dec. 9, 2014) — Use of anthracycline-based chemotherapy, a common treatment for breast cancer, has negligible cardiac toxicity in women whose tumors have BRCA1/2 mutations — despite preclinical evidence that such treatment can damage the heart.
The findings, to be presented Wednesday at the 2014 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS), represent a unique effort between cardiologists and oncologists at Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and MedStar Heart & Vascular Institute in Washington to answer a vital clinical question.
"Our study was prompted by evidence from animal studies suggesting that mice with BRCA1/2 mutations in the heart were susceptible to heart damage — treatment with anthracyclines led to reduced cardiac function and heart failure much more frequently in these mice than in those without these mutations," says the study's principal investigator, Ana Barac, MD, PhD, an assistant professor of medicine at Georgetown University School of Medicine and director of the cardio-oncology program at MedStar Heart & Vascular Institute.
"This was a very relevant question to explore for women with breast cancer who are BRCA1/2 mutation carriers because they often require treatment with anthracyclines," says Barac.
"Although there was no clinical suggestion of an excess risk of heart toxicity in mutation carriers, it is always important to carry out a study to evaluate whether findings in the preclinical setting — in laboratory animals — are actually valid concerns clinically," says co-author Claudine Isaacs, MD, co-director of the breast cancer program at Georgetown Lombardi.
"These results are very reassuring," Isaacs adds.
"Overall this is great news for our patients with BRCA mutations," says the study's co-investigator Filipa Lynce, MD, an oncologist with MedStar Georgetown University Hospital. "Our results provide reassurance that these patients do not appear to have increased heart toxicity when compared with non-mutation carriers," says Lynce, who will present the study at SABCS.
The study included 81 participants — 39 BRCA1/2 carriers and 42 patients without the mutation. Women with metastatic disease and HER2-positive breast cancer were not included. The analysis also excluded patients who had history of hypertension because of its confounding effect on myocardial strain.
The participants had an echocardiogram 45 months, on average, after treatment with anthracyclines. The study used two measures to determine heart function: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) — the percentage of blood that leaves the heart after each contraction — and global longitudinal strain (GLS), which correlates with LVEF but "is considered to be a more sensitive, global measure of cardiac function," Barac says.
The researchers found that most women had normal LVEF (91 percent) and normal GLS (85 percent). LVEF was borderline reduced (the heart pumped a little less blood than normal) in one BRCA1/2 mutation carrier and borderline or mildly reduced in six non-mutation carriers. They also found reduced GLS present in four mutation-carriers and seven non-mutation carriers.
"We found that mutation carriers who received anthracycline treatment do not have an increased risk of cardiac dysfunction, and that reduced cardiac function was very low in all patients, suggesting low risk of cardiac problems late after chemotherapy treatment," Barac says. "Our results are applicable only to patients without significant cardiovascular risk factors, particularly hypertension."
The study was supported by a grant from Georgetown Lombardi's Fisher Center for Familial Research. Barac is supported by a GHUCCTSA KL2 award, which is funded in whole or in part with federal funds (KL2TR000102 previously KL2RR031974) from the National Institutes of Health, through the Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program (CTSA).
About Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center
Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, part of Georgetown University Medical Center and MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, seeks to improve the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of cancer through innovative basic and clinical research, patient care, community education and outreach, and the training of cancer specialists of the future. Georgetown Lombardi is one of only 41 comprehensive cancer centers in the nation, as designated by the National Cancer Institute (grant #P30 CA051008), and the only one in the Washington, DC area. For more information, go tohttp://lombardi.georgetown.edu.
About Georgetown University Medical Center
Georgetown University Medical Center (GUMC) is an internationally recognized academic medical center with a three-part mission of research, teaching and patient care (through MedStar Health). GUMC's mission is carried out with a strong emphasis on public service and a dedication to the Catholic, Jesuit principle of cura personalis -- or "care of the whole person." The Medical Center includes the School of Medicine and the School of Nursing & Health Studies, both nationally ranked; Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, designated as a comprehensive cancer center by the National Cancer Institute; and the Biomedical Graduate Research Organization, which accounts for the majority of externally funded research at GUMC including a Clinical and Translational Science Award from the National Institutes of Health.
Back to Top